Sunday, December 19, 2021

Zenith Daylong - Oct 14, 2021 - Board 9

Board 9
Opponents vulnerable

♠ K J 4   J 6 2   Q 7 3  ♣ 10 7 5 4  

Partner opens with one spade. I raise to two spades. Partner goes on to four, and West leads the heart ten.


NORTH
Phillip
♠ K J 4
J 6 2
Q 7 3
♣ 10 7 5 4






SOUTH
Robot
♠ Q 10 7 6 2
A Q 9 5
A K 4
♣ 3


West North East South
Robot Phillip Robot Robot



1 ♠
Pass 2 ♠ Pass 4 ♠
(All pass)


That's quite an aggressive four-spade bid! A short-suit try in clubs looks more to the point. But with all my high cards outside clubs, I would have accepted despite my minimum. So no harm done.

Assuming the lead is from shortness, I can take four heart tricks if I guess the suit. I start by covering with the jack and taking the king with my ace. If the lead is from stiff 10, 104, or 103, I can take a double finesse against the 87. If the lead is from 108 or 107, I need to cash the queen then get to dummy to finesse against the remaining spot. 

The double finesse works against more layouts, but it's hard to execute without running into a a heart ruff. So my initial plan will be to draw trump, cash the heart queen, hoping to drop the eight or seven, then reach dummy with the diamond queen for a finesse.

I cover with the jack--king--ace. Now six of spades (retaining the deuce on principle)--three--jack--nine. I play the spade king from dummy, and East pitches the diamond deuce. The spade deuce doesn't seem important anymore--if it ever was--so I play it. 

West takes the ace and shifts to the four of hearts. I don't think that was his best play. I wasn't picking up the heart suit without his help. I cover with the six, East covers with the eight, and I win with the queen. I draw trump and finesse the five of hearts to make five.


NORTH
Phillip
♠ K J 4
J 6 2
Q 7 3
♣ 10 7 5 4


WEST
Robot
♠ A 8 5 3
10 4
9 6
♣ A Q 9 6 2


EAST
Robot
♠ 9
K 8 7 3
J 10 8 5 2
♣ K J 8


SOUTH
Robot
♠ Q 10 7 6 2
A Q 9 5
A K 4
♣ 3


450 is worth 77%. Obviously West can hold me to four by not playing the second round of hearts, but the defense went the same way at every table. Luckily for me, not all declarers took advantage. The five was apparently too lowly a card to merit their attention. But the overtrick wasn't the only reason this was a good result. Quite a few players responded one notrump, corrected two hearts to two spades, and played it there.

This is a ten-loser hand with no aces, so I can see how some might judge it isn't worth a single raise. But the jack of spades is a big card. And I don't share the common view that 4333 is necessarily a bad pattern. It can be, but a lot depends on the pattern it faces. Opposite a five-five, for example, a 4333 is actually a plus--not a minus. Doubletons are useful when they are opposite partner's three-card suits. But holding three cards in partner's side five-card suit can be better than holding a doubleton, since it makes it easier for him to establish his long cards. And we don't need to go to such extremes. Even opposite a 4432, a 4333 can be better than a 4432 with matching doubletons.

Perhaps 4333 is a net minus if we know nothing about partner's shape. But, even so, it's not as much of a minus as most people think or as loser count suggests. Evaluating 4333 as a full loser more than 4432 is too pessimistic. So, in my judgment, this hand is a sound minimum raise. And the fact that four spades is a fine contract even though partner overbid with his four-spade call is a testament to that.

7 comments:

  1. Typo.
    About paragraph six if I counted correctly.
    "East takes the ace ..." should be
    "West takes the ace ..."
    Thanks again for posting these.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nitpicking. After re-reading it, in the previous paragraph it says "West pitches the diamond deuce." I think it should be "East pitches ..."

      Delete
    2. Thanks. Sometimes I think keeping the opponents' directions straight is the hardest part of the blog.

      Delete
  2. Terminology question. You said you "finessed the five of hearts," but you held that card.

    I've seen "finesse the Queen", "finesse with the Queen", "finesse against the Queen", and probably a few other variations. I would think "finesse the Queen" means the opponent has the Queen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obviously if you think of finesse as a synonym for "circumvent," then it is your opponent's card that you are finessing. But I don't think that's normal bridge usage. If I lead to dummy's ace-queen and play the queen, I would say, "I'm finessing the queen" or "I'm finessing against the king." I checked the "Finesse" article in The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge, and that's how they use the term as well, so at least Alan Truscott appears to have agreed with me. If Edgar were still around, I would ask him. I'm sure he would have thought about it already and have an opinion.

      This reminds me of another case of the bridge world's idiomatic usage of verb objects--this time one I've chosen to avoid. If RHO bids one heart and you bid one spade, most people would say "I overcalled one spade." That doesn't sound right to me. In my view, you overcalled one heart. You overcalled WITH one spade.

      Delete
  3. Wikipedia agrees with you, too. In your second example, punctuation would change the meaning. "I overcalled: one spade." It would also be accurate to say "I overcalled with one spade" when bidding 2D over 1H, holding x, Kxx, AQJTxxx, Kxx

    ReplyDelete